Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 13 de 13
Filter
1.
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz ; 66(3): 283-291, 2023 Mar.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2241229

ABSTRACT

Many people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) were much more affected by COVID-19 than the average population. The morbidity in this population group was significantly higher due to the form of their housing and care as well as disability-associated health factors (such as Down's syndrome). This led, among other things, to a higher incidence of inpatient settings, a higher mortality rate among hospitalized patients, and a higher case fatality rate among certain subgroups. Risk factors were co-diseases such as dysphagia, epilepsy, or mental disorders. In addition, there were health consequences from restrictive exposure prophylaxis measures at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic.This overview article describes the main developments in the care of people with IDD since the beginning of the pandemic. New mental problems or an increase in existing mental problems occurred more frequently in people with IDD who were cared for on an outpatient basis or by relatives. People with IDD in inpatient residential facilities were less frequently affected. The main reasons for psychological problems were lack of social contacts, lost work and employment opportunities, the frightening pandemic situation, and the major structural and personnel changes in the facilities at the beginning of the pandemic. During the pandemic, there were also problems with the implementation of therapeutic and preventive measures. On the other hand, especially in the inpatient area, the "slowing down of life" associated with the restrictions at the beginning of the pandemic also had a stress-reducing effect on some of the people with IDD and was perceived by them as something positive. Caregivers had more time for the genuine (i.e., pedagogical) work. Overall, it was shown that health-promoting measures must also take into account the great heterogeneity of the people with IDD and their living conditions during the pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Intellectual Disability , Child , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/psychology , Pandemics/prevention & control , Developmental Disabilities/epidemiology , Developmental Disabilities/therapy , Intellectual Disability/epidemiology , Intellectual Disability/therapy , Intellectual Disability/complications , Germany/epidemiology , Risk Factors
2.
JAMA ; 328(16): 1587-1588, 2022 10 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2231511

ABSTRACT

This Viewpoint discusses 3 types of systemic health inequity experienced by individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities­stigma, exclusion, and devaluation of worth; underrepresentation in population epidemiology and research; and inadequate access to care and social services­and suggests potential approaches to ameliorating inequities in each of these areas.


Subject(s)
Developmental Disabilities , Disabled Persons , Health Equity , Intellectual Disability , Child , Humans , Developmental Disabilities/therapy , Health Equity/standards , Healthcare Disparities , Intellectual Disability/therapy
4.
J Intellect Disabil Res ; 66(5): 399-412, 2022 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1764976

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Due to the functional, cognitive and communication impairments associated with intellectual and/or developmental disabilities (IDD), adaptations to service delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic may impact people with IDD differently than others. For community and hospital-based services, this study describes the proportion of adults with and without IDD who used health care in the year pre-COVID-19 and the first year of the pandemic. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used linked health administrative databases to identify adults aged 18-105 years with and without IDD using unique encoded identifiers. Counts and proportions of adults who used health care services were reported for the pre-COVID-19 year (16 March 2019 to 14 March 2020) and the first COVID-19 year (15 March 2020 to 15 March 2021). RESULTS: Across services, the proportion of adults who used services was lower during the first COVID-19 year compared with the year prior, except for virtual physician visits that increased markedly for people with and without IDD. While the proportion of adults who used services was higher for those with IDD compared with those without IDD for both years, differences were greatest for mental health emergency visits and hospitalisations; adults with IDD were 6.3 to 10.9 times more likely to use these services than others with no IDD during the pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: During the first COVID-19 year in Ontario, Canada, service use decreased for all service types, except for virtual physician visits. In both years, adults with IDD remained more likely to use services than other adults, with the largest differences in use of mental health hospitalisations and mental health emergency department visits.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Intellectual Disability , Adult , COVID-19/epidemiology , Child , Delivery of Health Care , Developmental Disabilities/complications , Developmental Disabilities/epidemiology , Developmental Disabilities/therapy , Hospitals , Humans , Intellectual Disability/complications , Intellectual Disability/epidemiology , Intellectual Disability/therapy , Ontario/epidemiology , Pandemics , Retrospective Studies
5.
BMJ Open ; 11(10): e052482, 2021 10 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1450608

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study explores the hospital journey of patients with intellectual disabilities (IDs) compared with the general population after admission for COVID-19 during the first wave of the pandemic (when demand on inpatient resources was high) to identify disparities in treatment and outcomes. DESIGN: Matched cohort study; an ID cohort of 506 patients were matched based on age, sex and ethnicity with a control group using a 1:3 ratio to compare outcomes from the International Severe Acute Respiratory and emerging Infections Consortium WHO Clinical Characterisation Protocol UK. SETTING: Admissions for COVID-19 from UK hospitals; data on symptoms, severity, access to interventions, complications, mortality and length of stay were extracted. INTERVENTIONS: Non-invasive respiratory support, intubation, tracheostomy, ventilation and admission to intensive care units (ICU). RESULTS: Subjective presenting symptoms such as loss of taste/smell were less frequently reported in ID patients, whereas indicators of more severe disease such as altered consciousness and seizures were more common. Controls had higher rates of cardiovascular risk factors, asthma, rheumatological disorder and smoking. ID patients were admitted with higher respiratory rates (median=22, range=10-48) and were more likely to require oxygen therapy (35.1% vs 28.9%). Despite this, ID patients were 37% (95% CI 13% to 57%) less likely to receive non-invasive respiratory support, 40% (95% CI 7% to 63%) less likely to receive intubation and 50% (95% CI 30% to 66%) less likely to be admitted to the ICU while in hospital. They had a 56% (95% CI 17% to 102%) increased risk of dying from COVID-19 after they were hospitalised and were dying 1.44 times faster (95% CI 1.13 to 1.84) compared with controls. CONCLUSIONS: There have been significant disparities in healthcare between people with ID and the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic, which may have contributed to excess mortality in this group.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Intellectual Disability , Cohort Studies , Hospitals , Humans , Intellectual Disability/epidemiology , Intellectual Disability/therapy , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , United Kingdom/epidemiology
6.
Autism ; 25(6): 1627-1639, 2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1416764

ABSTRACT

LAY ABSTRACT: Autistic children who speak few or no words or who have an intellectual disability are the most in need of new understandings and treatments, but the most often left out of the research that can bring these benefits. Researchers perceive difficulties around compliance with instructions, testing, challenging behaviours and family stress. Although research with these children can indeed be difficult, their continuing exclusion is unethical and unacceptable. Drawing on our experiences testing a possible treatment for children with profound autism, we provide 10 practical guidelines related to (1) interacting physically, (2) combining play and testing, (3) responding to challenging behaviour, (4) finding suitable tests, (5) relationships with parents, (6) relationships with siblings, (7) involving stakeholders, (8) planning the testing times, (9) the role of the clinical supervisor and (10) recruiting and retaining participants. We hope that these guidelines will prepare and embolden other research teams to work with profoundly autistic children, ending their historical exclusion from research. These guidelines also could be useful for conducting research with children with intellectual disabilities.


Subject(s)
Autism Spectrum Disorder , Autistic Disorder , Intellectual Disability , Autism Spectrum Disorder/therapy , Autistic Disorder/therapy , Child , Communication , Humans , Intellectual Disability/therapy , Parents
7.
Res Dev Disabil ; 114: 103985, 2021 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1213505

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) may be especially vulnerable to changes associated with the COVID-19 pandemic given an increased likelihood of health concerns, low socioeconomic status, and difficulty accessing services. AIMS: The purpose of this study was to explore mental health problems and services in individuals with IDD during the pandemic. We explored whether number of mental health problems differed by disability, age, gender, living situation, physical health, and access to services. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: An online survey about experiences during the pandemic was administered to adults with IDD and their caregivers in the United States and in Chile. OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: In both Chile and the United States, few people endorsed increased health problems. Half of the sample in Chile and 41 % of the sample in the United States endorsed increased mental health problems. Approximately 15 % of the sample in the US reported no longer receiving state developmental disability services. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Healthcare and disability-specific agencies should consider strategies to tailor supports to improve mental health functioning and access to community.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Developmental Disabilities , Intellectual Disability , Mental Health , Adult , Chile , Developmental Disabilities/epidemiology , Developmental Disabilities/therapy , Health Services Accessibility , Humans , Intellectual Disability/epidemiology , Intellectual Disability/therapy , Pandemics , United States/epidemiology
8.
J Intellect Disabil Res ; 65(7): 617-625, 2021 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1160090

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Workers supporting adults with intellectual disabilities (ID) experience significant stress in their essential role during COVID-19 due to the high risk of their clients contracting COVID-19 and having adverse outcomes. The purpose of the current study was to describe the attitudes of workers towards COVID-19 vaccination prior to vaccination rollout, with a view to informing strategies to promote vaccine uptake within this high-risk sector. METHODS: An online survey was sent via email to workers supporting adults with ID in Ontario, Canada, between January 21 and February 3, 2021 by agency leadership and union representatives. RESULTS: Three thousand and three hundred and seventy-one workers, representing approximately 11.2% of Ontario workers supporting adults with ID completed an online survey. Most reported that they were very likely (62%) or likely (20%) to get a COVID-19 vaccine (vaccination intent) although 18% reported they were less likely to do so (vaccination nonintent). Workers with vaccination nonintent were younger and were more likely to endorse the beliefs that (1) it will not benefit them or those around them, (2) it was not part of their job, (3) rapid development confers uncertainties and risks, and (4) they were scared of potential vaccine side effects. CONCLUSIONS: There is need to address common misconceptions among workers supporting adults with ID to help activate them as vaccine advocates in the communities they serve. Partnered efforts between workers, unions and agency leadership with public health experts to address concerns are required.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , COVID-19 Vaccines , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Intellectual Disability/therapy , Adult , Female , Health Care Surveys/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Ontario
9.
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil ; 34(4): 950-972, 2021 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1127485

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The use of eHealth, which has accelerated in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, could contribute to the access to tailor-made psychological interventions for people with intellectual disabilities. METHOD: A scoping review was conducted on peer-reviewed studies between 1996-2019. RESULTS: Thirty-three studies reported on the use of psychological eHealth interventions focused on mental health problems and/or challenging behaviour. The vast majority of these studies reported on interventions that were delivered at the individual level. The context in which these interventions were delivered varied, primarily ranging from the home setting to residential settings, as well as day or activity centres and schools. The studies described various types of interventions: telehealth interventions, computerized cognitive behavioural therapy, and interventions focused on (social) learning principles targeting challenging behaviour. CONCLUSIONS: eHealth provides new opportunities for both therapists and lay-therapists to deliver psychological interventions. Future studies should focus on the effectiveness of psychological eHealth interventions.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Delivery of Health Care/methods , Health Services Accessibility , Intellectual Disability/therapy , Telemedicine , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Humans , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2
10.
J Asthma ; 59(4): 712-718, 2022 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1075351

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The main goal of this study was to conduct a needs assessment to ascertain professionals' and parents' knowledge of and perceptions about education for self-management of asthma for children with physical and intellectual disabilities (IDs). Another goal was to understand needs for education of children with IDs about severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2; coronavirus) and other infectious diseases. METHODS: Surveys, presented in the RedCap system, were administered online. Respondents (n = 498) were recruited through sites and listservs for children with disabilities and individuals with asthma. Respondents answered eight questions about knowledge and education for self-management of asthma for children with physical disabilities and IDs. Respondents answered four questions pertaining to management of coronavirus for children with IDs. RESULTS: Respondents' indicated that it would be easier to educate youth with mild or moderate versus severe levels of disabilities. Children with IDs may not receive the education they need to manage their asthma. When comparing those in different occupations, teachers reported lower knowledge for educating children with IDs about asthma management and coronavirus. CONCLUSIONS: Doctors and nurses can develop programs for children with physical disabilities and IDs. Programming for youth with severe impairments is needed and perhaps developmentally appropriate programming for youth with IDs will improve education of youth and, concomitantly improve their self-management of asthma and potentially quality of life. Educating teachers is critical specifically about asthma triggers, how to involve youth in self-care, and how to educate children with IDs about coronavirus.Abbreviations:U.S.: United States;IDs: intellectual disabilities.


Subject(s)
Asthma , COVID-19 , Intellectual Disability , Self-Management , Adolescent , Asthma/therapy , Child , Humans , Intellectual Disability/therapy , Quality of Life , SARS-CoV-2
11.
Intellect Dev Disabil ; 59(1): 1-6, 2021 02 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1067377

ABSTRACT

The last three issues of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (IDD) have featured perspectives from a diverse set of contributors on how the field of intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) is being impacted by COVID-19. As four newly appointed faculty members with diverse backgrounds, the editor of IDD invited us to share our experiences with beginning academic careers during this unique time. In making this request, he pointed out that approximately half the members of the American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (AAIDD) are those who have some type of affiliation with an institution of higher education. While the perspectives outlined in this article do not represent those of all early career faculty, we hope our stories resonate with IDD readers who may be facing similar circumstances. This article includes a series of brief essays addressing how the pandemic has affected our academic job searches, research, teaching, and service. Although penned by different authors, each section encompasses our collective experiences, concerns, and hopes for the broader IDD community. We close with guiding questions that might support more socially responsive and integrated approaches to traditional academic roles as faculty continue to navigate the repercussions of COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Intellectual Disability , Career Mobility , Faculty, Medical/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Intellectual Disability/diagnosis , Intellectual Disability/therapy , Teaching
12.
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil ; 34(4): 1089-1097, 2021 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1066704

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We used a qualitative approach to explore the experiences of social care staff regarding the provision of positive behavioural support (PBS) to people with an intellectual disability at the height of the Covid-19 restrictions. METHOD: We conducted semi-structured interviews with 19 staff who had recently completed a PBS workforce development programme. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Three themes were identified in the context of the restrictions: The challenges to maintaining quality of life and PBS of the people being supported and staff attempts to overcome these; the ways in which PBS and behaviour support plans were implemented and the impact on behaviours that challenge; the ways in which PBS principles were applied at organisational levels to help to understand and address staff stress and distress. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the staff identified many unexpected benefits of the restrictions. The results are discussed in the context of the study limitations.


Subject(s)
Autistic Disorder/psychology , Behavior Therapy , COVID-19/psychology , Intellectual Disability/psychology , Autistic Disorder/therapy , COVID-19/epidemiology , Humans , Intellectual Disability/therapy , Interviews as Topic , Physical Distancing , Qualitative Research , Quality of Life , SARS-CoV-2 , Social Isolation/psychology
13.
J Intellect Disabil Res ; 64(7): 475-481, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-88435

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been announced as a new coronavirus disease by the World Health Organization. At the time of writing this article (April 2020), the world is drastically influenced by the COVID-19. Recently, the COVID-19 Open Research Dataset (CORD-19) was published. For researchers on ID such as ourselves, it is of key interest to learn whether this open research dataset may be used to investigate the virus and its consequences for people with an ID. METHODS: From CORD-19, we identified full-text articles containing terms related to the ID care and applied a text mining technique, specifically the term frequency-inverse document frequency analysis in combination with K-means clustering. RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-nine articles contained one or more of our specified terms related to ID. We were able to cluster these articles related to ID into five clusters on different topics, namely: mental health, viral diseases, diagnoses and treatments, maternal care and paediatrics, and genetics. CONCLUSION: The CORD-19 open research dataset consists of valuable information about not only COVID-19 disease but also ID and the relationship between them. We suggest researchers investigate literature-based discovery approaches on the CORD-19 and develop a new dataset that addresses the intersection of these two fields for further research.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections , Data Mining , Databases, Factual , Datasets as Topic , Intellectual Disability/therapy , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral , Bibliometrics , COVID-19 , Humans , Machine Learning
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL